DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE EXAM OUTLINE | DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE RELIABLE BRAINDUMPS FILES

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Outline | Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Braindumps Files

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Outline | Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Braindumps Files

Blog Article

Tags: Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Outline, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Braindumps Files, New Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Questions, Download Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Demo, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Pdf Demo Download

Are you still silly to spend much time to prepare for your test but still fail again and again? Do you find that some candidates pass exam easily with Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps questions? If your goal is passing exams and obtain certifications our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps can help you achieve your goal easily, why not choose us? Only dozen of money and 20-35 hours' valid preparation before the test with Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps questions will make you clear exam surely. So why are you still wasting so many time to do useless effort?

The Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study materials of our company is the study tool which best suits these people who long to pass the exam and get the related certification. So we want to tell you that it is high time for you to buy and use our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials carefully. Now we are glad to introduce the study materials from our company to you in detail in order to let you understanding our study products.

>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Outline <<

Verified Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Outline - Well-Prepared & Realistic Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Materials Free Download for Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam

Our experts have great familiarity with Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate real exam in this area. With passing rate up to 98 to 100 percent, we promise the profession of them and infallibility of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice materials. So you won’t be pestered with the difficulties of the exam any more. What is more, our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps can realize your potentiality greatly. Unlike some irresponsible companies who churn out some Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study guide, we are looking forward to cooperate fervently.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.
Topic 2
  • Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.
Topic 3
  • Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q17-Q22):

NEW QUESTION # 17
A Generative Al Engineer has created a RAG application to look up answers to questions about a series of fantasy novels that are being asked on the author's web forum. The fantasy novel texts are chunked and embedded into a vector store with metadata (page number, chapter number, book title), retrieved with the user' s query, and provided to an LLM for response generation. The Generative AI Engineer used their intuition to pick the chunking strategy and associated configurations but now wants to more methodically choose the best values.
Which TWO strategies should the Generative AI Engineer take to optimize their chunking strategy and parameters? (Choose two.)

  • A. Add a classifier for user queries that predicts which book will best contain the answer. Use this to filter retrieval.
  • B. Create an LLM-as-a-judge metric to evaluate how well previous questions are answered by the most appropriate chunk. Optimize the chunking parameters based upon the values of the metric.
  • C. Choose an appropriate evaluation metric (such as recall or NDCG) and experiment with changes in the chunking strategy, such as splitting chunks by paragraphs or chapters.
    Choose the strategy that gives the best performance metric.
  • D. Pass known questions and best answers to an LLM and instruct the LLM to provide the best token count. Use a summary statistic (mean, median, etc.) of the best token counts to choose chunk size.
  • E. Change embedding models and compare performance.

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
To optimize a chunking strategy for a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application, the Generative AI Engineer needs a structured approach to evaluating the chunking strategy, ensuring that the chosen configuration retrieves the most relevant information and leads to accurate and coherent LLM responses.
Here's whyCandEare the correct strategies:
Strategy C: Evaluation Metrics (Recall, NDCG)
* Define an evaluation metric: Common evaluation metrics such as recall, precision, or NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) measure how well the retrieved chunks match the user's query and the expected response.
* Recallmeasures the proportion of relevant information retrieved.
* NDCGis often used when you want to account for both the relevance of retrieved chunks and the ranking or order in which they are retrieved.
* Experiment with chunking strategies: Adjusting chunking strategies based on text structure (e.g., splitting by paragraph, chapter, or a fixed number of tokens) allows the engineer to experiment with various ways of slicing the text. Some chunks may better align with the user's query than others.
* Evaluate performance: By using recall or NDCG, the engineer can methodically test various chunking strategies to identify which one yields the highest performance. This ensures that the chunking method provides the most relevant information when embedding and retrieving data from the vector store.
Strategy E: LLM-as-a-Judge Metric
* Use the LLM as an evaluator: After retrieving chunks, the LLM can be used to evaluate the quality of answers based on the chunks provided. This could be framed as a "judge" function, where the LLM compares how well a given chunk answers previous user queries.
* Optimize based on the LLM's judgment: By having the LLM assess previous answers and rate their relevance and accuracy, the engineer can collect feedback on how well different chunking configurations perform in real-world scenarios.
* This metric could be a qualitative judgment on how closely the retrieved information matches the user's intent.
* Tune chunking parameters: Based on the LLM's judgment, the engineer can adjust the chunk size or structure to better align with the LLM's responses, optimizing retrieval for future queries.
By combining these two approaches, the engineer ensures that the chunking strategy is systematically evaluated using both quantitative (recall/NDCG) and qualitative (LLM judgment) methods. This balanced optimization process results in improved retrieval relevance and, consequently, better response generation by the LLM.


NEW QUESTION # 18
When developing an LLM application, it's crucial to ensure that the data used for training the model complies with licensing requirements to avoid legal risks.
Which action is NOT appropriate to avoid legal risks?

  • A. Only use data explicitly labeled with an open license and ensure the license terms are followed.
  • B. Reach out to the data curators directly after you have started using the trained model to let them know.
  • C. Use any available data you personally created which is completely original and you can decide what license to use.
  • D. Reach out to the data curators directly before you have started using the trained model to let them know.

Answer: B

Explanation:
* Problem Context: When using data to train a model, it's essential to ensure compliance with licensing to avoid legal risks. Legal issues can arise from using data without permission, especially when it comes from third-party sources.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Reaching out to data curatorsbeforeusing the data is an appropriate action. This allows you to ensure you have permission or understand the licensing terms before starting to use the data in your model.
* Option B: Usingoriginal datathat you personally created is always a safe option. Since you have full ownership over the data, there are no legal risks, as you control the licensing.
* Option C: Using data that is explicitly labeled with an open license and adhering to the license terms is a correct and recommended approach. This ensures compliance with legal requirements.
* Option D: Reaching out to the data curatorsafteryou have already started using the trained model isnot appropriate. If you've already used the data without understanding its licensing terms, you may have already violated the terms of use, which could lead to legal complications. It's essential to clarify the licensing termsbeforeusing the data, not after.
Thus,Option Dis not appropriate because it could expose you to legal risks by using the data without first obtaining the proper licensing permissions.


NEW QUESTION # 19
A Generative Al Engineer has successfully ingested unstructured documents and chunked them by document sections. They would like to store the chunks in a Vector Search index. The current format of the dataframe has two columns: (i) original document file name (ii) an array of text chunks for each document.
What is the most performant way to store this dataframe?

  • A. Flatten the dataframe to one chunk per row, create a unique identifier for each row, and save to a Delta table
  • B. First create a unique identifier for each document, then save to a Delta table
  • C. Split the data into train and test set, create a unique identifier for each document, then save to a Delta table
  • D. Store each chunk as an independent JSON file in Unity Catalog Volume. For each JSON file, the key is the document section name and the value is the array of text chunks for that section

Answer: A

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs an efficient way to store chunks of unstructured documents to facilitate easy retrieval and search. The current dataframe consists of document filenames and associated text chunks.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Splitting into train and test sets is more relevant for model training scenarios and not directly applicable to storage for retrieval in a Vector Search index.
* Option B: Flattening the dataframe such that each row contains a single chunk with a unique identifier is the most performant for storage and retrieval. This structure aligns well with how data is indexed and queried in vector search applications, making it easier to retrieve specific chunks efficiently.
* Option C: Creating a unique identifier for each document only does not address the need to access individual chunks efficiently, which is critical in a Vector Search application.
* Option D: Storing each chunk as an independent JSON file creates unnecessary overhead and complexity in managing and querying large volumes of files.
OptionBis the most efficient and practical approach, allowing for streamlined indexing and retrieval processes in a Delta table environment, fitting the requirements of a Vector Search index.


NEW QUESTION # 20
A Generative AI Engineer I using the code below to test setting up a vector store:

Assuming they intend to use Databricks managed embeddings with the default embedding model, what should be the next logical function call?

  • A. vsc.create_direct_access_index()
  • B. vsc.create_delta_sync_index()
  • C. vsc.get_index()
  • D. vsc.similarity_search()

Answer: B

Explanation:
Context: The Generative AI Engineer is setting up a vector store using Databricks' VectorSearchClient. This is typically done to enable fast and efficient retrieval of vectorized data for tasks like similarity searches.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: vsc.get_index(): This function would be used to retrieve an existing index, not create one, so it would not be the logical next step immediately after creating an endpoint.
* Option B: vsc.create_delta_sync_index(): After setting up a vector store endpoint, creating an index is necessary to start populating and organizing the data. The create_delta_sync_index() function specifically creates an index that synchronizes with a Delta table, allowing automatic updates as the data changes. This is likely the most appropriate choice if the engineer plans to use dynamic data that is updated over time.
* Option C: vsc.create_direct_access_index(): This function would create an index that directly accesses the data without synchronization. While also a valid approach, it's less likely to be the next logical step if the default setup (typically accommodating changes) is intended.
* Option D: vsc.similarity_search(): This function would be used to perform searches on an existing index; however, an index needs to be created and populated with data before any search can be conducted.
Given the typical workflow in setting up a vector store, the next step after creating an endpoint is to establish an index, particularly one that synchronizes with ongoing data updates, henceOption B.


NEW QUESTION # 21
A Generative AI Engineer is designing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform. The platform provides real-time updates and LLM-generated analyses for any users who would like to have live summaries, rather than reading a series of potentially outdated news articles.
Which tool below will give the platform access to real-time data for generating game analyses based on the latest game scores?

  • A. Foundation Model APIs
  • B. AutoML
  • C. Feature Serving
  • D. DatabrickslQ

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer is developing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform that needs to provide real-time updates and analyses based on the latest game scores. The critical requirement here is the capability to access and integrate real-time data efficiently with the platform for immediate analysis and reporting.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: DatabricksIQ: While DatabricksIQ offers integration and data processing capabilities, it is more aligned with data analytics rather than real-time feature serving, which is crucial for immediate updates necessary in a live sports commentary context.
* Option B: Foundation Model APIs: These APIs facilitate interactions with pre-trained models and could be part of the solution, but on their own, they do not provide mechanisms to access real- time game scores.
* Option C: Feature Serving: This is the correct answer as feature serving specifically refers to the real-time provision of data (features) to models for prediction. This would be essential for an LLM that generates analyses based on live game data, ensuring that the commentary is current and based on the latest events in the sport.
* Option D: AutoML: This tool automates the process of applying machine learning models to real-world problems, but it does not directly provide real-time data access, which is a critical requirement for the platform.
Thus,Option C(Feature Serving) is the most suitable tool for the platform as it directly supports the real-time data needs of an LLM-powered sports commentary system, ensuring that the analyses and updates are based on the latest available information.


NEW QUESTION # 22
......

Immediately after you have made a purchase for our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice dumps, you can download our exam study materials to make preparations for the exams. It is universally acknowledged that time is a key factor in terms of the success of exams. The more time you spend in the preparation for Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Training Materials, the higher possibility you will pass the exam. As you can see, we have invested big amount of money to give the most convinience for you to get our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam braindumps.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Braindumps Files: https://www.passsureexam.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-pass4sure-exam-dumps.html

Report this page